<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wave of Web &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.waveofweb.com/category/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.waveofweb.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What Does ALT Tag Do Except Giving You SEO Values?</title>
		<link>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/what-does-alt-tag-do-except-giving-you-seo-values/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/what-does-alt-tag-do-except-giving-you-seo-values/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 18:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waveofweb.com/?p=877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you know, using Alt tag gives you some extra  mileage for search engines to find your image. It gives you extra option to put chosen words so that when somebody searches search engines like Google, they can match the keywords with your Alt tag and show him the photo. So most of you will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you know, using Alt tag gives you some extra  mileage for search engines to find your image. It gives you extra option to put chosen words so that when somebody searches search engines like Google, they can match the keywords with your Alt tag and show him the photo. So most of you will stuff Alt tags with keywords. But be careful, as excessive stuffing can get you caught in spam filters of different search engines.</p>
<p>But why was this Alt tag invented? Have you ever thought of this question? Surely not to give you some SEO value <img src='http://www.waveofweb.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Alt tag is basically the text equivalent of your image. This doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean a decorated description or title. Ask yourself, what would you have put if you didn&#8217;t have the image in the first place? Does this text serves the purpose to share the basic information with the user as the image itself? Then you are using Alt tag with its true purpose <img src='http://www.waveofweb.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So if the browser is unable to display the image or the image is not available, the Alt tag text will be shown in the place of your picture. So your user will have at least some kind of idea what you were trying to express using the image.</p>
<p>I am pretty sure, you would still continue to make Alt tags keyword-centric. And there is no reason why you should not. But keep in mind its true purpose and your user <img src='http://www.waveofweb.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/what-does-alt-tag-do-except-giving-you-seo-values/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Official NoDofollow Addon Released for Firefox 3.6</title>
		<link>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/official-nodofollow-addon-released-for-firefox-3-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/official-nodofollow-addon-released-for-firefox-3-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waveofweb.com/?p=801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the title sums up pretty much everything. Some days back I told you about the working version of NoDofollow that was made by a fellow blogger to make the add-on work with Firefox 3.6. But today I checked the official Firefox add-on page for NoDofollow. And after a long delay the original developer has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the title sums up pretty much everything. Some days back I told you about <a href="http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/working-nodofollow-addon-for-firefox-3-6/" target="_blank">the working version of NoDofollow</a> that was made by a fellow blogger to make the add-on work with Firefox 3.6. But today I checked the<a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5687" target="_blank"> official Firefox add-on page</a> for NoDofollow. And after a long delay the original developer has released the updated version that will work with the latest Firefox. So enjoy this nice little plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/official-nodofollow-addon-released-for-firefox-3-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even With 301 Redirection For New Domain You Will Lose Some PR</title>
		<link>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/even-with-301-redirection-for-new-domain-you-will-lose-some-pr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/even-with-301-redirection-for-new-domain-you-will-lose-some-pr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waveofweb.com/?p=797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I was going through an interview of Matt Cutts at StoneTemple Consulting that was published about 10 days ago. And here this fact about 301 redirect caught my eyes. When we move to our new domain we usually use 301 redirect to seamlessly redirect our users and search engines to our new urls from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I was going through an <a href="http://www.stonetemple.com/articles/interview-matt-cutts-012510.shtml" target="_blank">interview of Matt Cutts at StoneTemple Consulting</a> that was published about 10 days ago. And here this fact about 301 redirect caught my eyes. When we move to our new domain we usually use 301 redirect to seamlessly redirect our users and search engines to our new urls from the old ones. And most of us, the webmasters know that pagerank juice and link popularity will be added by Google from the old domain after some time.</p>
<p>Well, that is still true. But think about this case. Somebody has linked to your old domain url. So first the link juice will be passed to the old domain and as you are using 301 redirect it will be passed to your new domain. But there will be natarul decay of link juice while passing from one link to another. Matt Cutts has confirmed this case. So you will still gain most of the PR but there will be some leakage of link juice. Here is what Matt Cutts had to say about it:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Eric Enge:</strong> Let’s say you move from one domain to  another and you write yourself a nice little statement that basically  instructs the search engine and, any user agent on how to remap from one  domain to the other.  In a scenario like this, is there some loss in  PageRank that can take place simply because the user who originally  implemented a link to the site didn&#8217;t link to it on the new domain?</p>
<p><strong>Matt Cutts:</strong> That&#8217;s a good question, and I am not  100 percent sure about the answer.  I can certainly see how there could  be some loss of PageRank. I am not 100 percent sure whether the crawling  and indexing team has implemented that sort of natural PageRank decay,  so I will have to go and check on that specific case. (Note: in a follow  on email, Matt confirmed that this is in fact the case.  There is some  loss of PR through a 301).</p></blockquote>
<p>So be a bit more serious while going for a new domain for your site <img src='http://www.waveofweb.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/even-with-301-redirection-for-new-domain-you-will-lose-some-pr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Working NoDofollow Addon For Firefox 3.6</title>
		<link>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/working-nodofollow-addon-for-firefox-3-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/working-nodofollow-addon-for-firefox-3-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waveofweb.com/?p=775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have used NoDofollow add-on for Firefox for a long time now. It is actually my favourite Firefox addon, just a little one effective enough to show you dofollow and nofollow links. But as I upgraded Firefox to latest version 3.6 some days ago, I found NoDofollow is  not woking with it. So I waited [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used NoDofollow add-on for Firefox for a long time now. It is actually my favourite Firefox addon, just a little one effective enough to show you dofollow and nofollow links. But as I upgraded Firefox to latest version 3.6 some days ago, I found NoDofollow is  not woking with it. So I waited and waited for the original developer to make an update to support it for latest Firefox. But it hasn&#8217;t happened yet. But today I found an unofficial version of NoDofollow that supports Firefox 3.6. You can find it in <a href="http://www.scottmillar.co.uk/nodofollow-firefox-plugin-working-with-3-6" target="_blank">Scott Miller&#8217;s blog</a>. I tested it personally in my Firefox 3.6 and it is working perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/working-nodofollow-addon-for-firefox-3-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Expect SEO Value From Comment Spamming</title>
		<link>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/dont-expect-seo-value-from-comment-spamming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/dont-expect-seo-value-from-comment-spamming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 04:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waveofweb.com/?p=688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 10 days ago, Google published a post about comment spam on their WebmasterCentral blog. They have warned that they have the means for understanding the link graph &#38; they can determine and tackle comment spam links using algorithmic methods. They can even determine the fine-line spams that some webmasters deploy like instead of blunt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 10 days ago, Google published <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/11/hard-facts-about-comment-spam.html" target="_blank">a post about comment spam</a> on their WebmasterCentral blog. They have warned that they have the means for understanding the link graph &amp; they can determine and tackle comment spam links using algorithmic methods. They can even determine the fine-line spams that some webmasters deploy like instead of blunt spam they will say &#8220;great site!&#8221; as a comment with a keyword as their name. So in best case, you will receive a little or no SEO value at all for posting meaningless comments in other websites &amp; blogs.</p>
<p>But still I doubt if spammers will stop spamming. These may be hard facts about comment spam, but comment spammers are hard nuts to crack. They perhaps just like to spam <img src='http://www.waveofweb.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/dont-expect-seo-value-from-comment-spamming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Quick Round Up on Google&#8217;s Stand on Duplicate Content &amp; Meta Tags</title>
		<link>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/a-quick-round-up-on-googles-stand-on-duplicate-content-meta-tags/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/a-quick-round-up-on-googles-stand-on-duplicate-content-meta-tags/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waveofweb.com/?p=620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[October has just started. Last month Google cleared their point of view on two so-called SEO factors. One is duplicate content problem &#38; another is using keywords and description meta tags. As you might have found, this blog was down most of the time last month, thanks to the previous hosting! So I thought of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>October has just started. Last month Google cleared their point of view on two so-called SEO factors. One is duplicate content problem &amp; another is using keywords and description meta tags. As you might have found, this blog was down most of the time last month, thanks to the previous hosting! So I thought of updating you quickly on these two things if you have missed.</p>
<p>Google won&#8217;t penalize a site for duplicate content. That&#8217;s the bottom line. So actually it breaks a general myth as you can say. So what Google actually wants is diversity in results. So if you make some little adjustments your site may also be shown in search results. Otherwise there&#8217;s possibility that your site may end up as one of these.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-621" title="repeated-search-results" src="http://www.waveofweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/repeat-search.jpg" alt="repeated-search-results" width="610" height="57" /></p>
<p>It is a negative effect no doubt. But Google consider that most duplicate content sites are not spam. They have their own methods to detect spam &amp; they banned them for being spam, but not for being duplicate <img src='http://www.waveofweb.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Now I am coming to meta tags. Here Google confirmed the long time predictions. Google simply don&#8217;t consider keywords meta tag in SEO. The reason is simple. It has been abused quite extensively for keyword stuffing to manipulate  SERPs. Suppose, you are targeting keywords that are not in your niche &amp; getting hits for that where users find nothing about the topic. That&#8217;s why Google removed it as SEO factor years ago.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-624" title="meta-description-tag" src="http://www.waveofweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/meta-description-tag.png" alt="meta-description-tag" width="400" height="198" /></p>
<p>In case of description meta tag, it can be useful if Google don&#8217;t find a suitable search snippet &amp; will use it instead. Check the above screenshot for an example. But from SEO point of view, it has no effect.</p>
<p>If you want to read the original posts, here is the link for <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/duplicate-content-and-multiple-site.html" target="_blank">duplicate content</a> &amp; here is for <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/09/google-does-not-use-keywords-meta-tag.html" target="_blank">meta tags</a>. They have cool videos attached too. Nowadays Google seem to be publicly releasing more of their point of views on SEO. It is better to know what are going to need to do clearly. When I started it was not like this. If you are a beginner, you are going to like this more <img src='http://www.waveofweb.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/a-quick-round-up-on-googles-stand-on-duplicate-content-meta-tags/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A few Things That You Need to Know About PageRank Sculpting</title>
		<link>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/a-few-things-that-you-need-to-know-about-pagerank-sculpting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/a-few-things-that-you-need-to-know-about-pagerank-sculpting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 09:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waveofweb.com/?p=481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was going through a post by Matt Cutts on PageRank Sculpting. And it really explains a few basic things on PageRank mechanism from Google&#8217;s point of view. It undermines the importance of PageRank Sculpting. If you don&#8217;t know what PageRank Sculpting is, then for a primary knowledge I can say that it is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going through a post by Matt Cutts on PageRank Sculpting. And it really explains a few basic things on PageRank mechanism from Google&#8217;s point of view. It undermines the importance of PageRank Sculpting. If you don&#8217;t know what PageRank Sculpting is, then for a primary knowledge I can say that it is a way of controlling link juice flow within your site by making certain link portion nofollow artifially. For example, consider making &#8220;Archives&#8221; &amp; &#8220;Category&#8221; part of your WordPress blog nofollow. Here are a few quick things that you should know from that post:</p>
<ul>
<li>Nofollow link doesn&#8217;t pass PageRank juice at all. You can be sure of that.</li>
<li>Now I am giving an example from that post about the link juice flow. Suppose you have 10 PageRank points on a page. The page contains 10 outbound links &amp; 5 of them are nofollow. And there is no decay of link juice while passing. So you will think, 5 dofollow links will get 2 points each. But that is not the case. Rather 5 dofollow links will get 1 point each.</li>
</ul>
<p>As you can see, even though nofollow links doesn&#8217;t pass PR, it consumes the PR points. So even if you mark certain links nofollow, you are loosing points depending on the number of nofollow links. So there is not much of value in doing PageRank Sculpting. That&#8217;s what you need to know as a new one in the webmaster field.</p>
<p>By the way, if you have some sort of knowledge &amp; want to explore the post if you haven&#8217;t already, here is the <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/pagerank-sculpting/" target="_blank">link</a> to the blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/a-few-things-that-you-need-to-know-about-pagerank-sculpting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Unexpected PageRank Update From Google</title>
		<link>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/an-unexpected-pagerank-update-from-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/an-unexpected-pagerank-update-from-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waveofweb.com/?p=468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah! I have to say it is unexpected, as it happened within a month of last public PR update. As you know the last update took place on 27/28 May. And now from 23rd June people started reporting changes in PageRank. Usually toolbar PR update is released by Google in two-three moths span. So there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah! I have to say it is unexpected, as it happened within a month of last public PR update. As you know the last update took place on 27/28 May. And now from 23rd June people started reporting changes in PageRank. Usually toolbar PR update is released by Google in two-three moths span. So there is a reason to get a bit astonished.</p>
<p>By the way, this blog retained its PageRank to 2. I am quite busy with my work lately. And my posting has gone a bit irregular. But really I never get detouched to blogging. Though I am not a pro-blogger, but it is more than a hobby to me <img src='http://www.waveofweb.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/an-unexpected-pagerank-update-from-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hardly Any Improvement With Auto-Approval Directories</title>
		<link>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/hardly-any-improvement-with-auto-approval-directories/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/hardly-any-improvement-with-auto-approval-directories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 04:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waveofweb.com/?p=445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have seen quite a few people asking for instant-approval directory list in webmaster forums like Digitalpoint. They look for auto-approval directories so that they can get some quick backlinks. But don&#8217;t just concentrate only on it. Not only the number of backlinks but also the quality of backlinks matters, and in a big way [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen quite a few people asking for instant-approval directory list in webmaster forums like Digitalpoint. They look for auto-approval directories so that they can get some quick backlinks. But don&#8217;t just concentrate only on it. Not only the number of backlinks but also the quality of backlinks matters, and in a big way too.</p>
<p>Search engines like Google consider the neighbourhood the link is coming from. If you get a link from a bunch of relevant high quality sites, it will give your site a boost. Obviously sitelinks in auto-directories can be irrelevant, less-quality &amp; even spam. No one checks them before publishing. And spammers are always there to take opportunity of it. So backlink to your site from there may yield almost no link value. Rather if you gain an approved link from a well-moderated directory after 15-20 days, it may increase your site auhority. So don&#8217;t just run after some quick automatic links. Create a good site with content &amp; then submit it to some well-organized manual directories. It will help you in long run. You can&#8217;t gain  much instantly in SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/hardly-any-improvement-with-auto-approval-directories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is The Difference Between PR0 &amp; PR N/A</title>
		<link>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/what-is-the-difference-between-pr0-pr-na/</link>
		<comments>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/what-is-the-difference-between-pr0-pr-na/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waveofweb.com/?p=427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I posted on a forum about a site of mine. It&#8217;s brand new &#38; pagerank is n/a. But I mentioned it as PR0. A member was quite precise &#38; he corrected that Then I thought I should write a post about the difference between PR 0 &#38; n/a. It may look same but there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I posted on a forum about a site of mine. It&#8217;s brand new &amp; pagerank is n/a. But I mentioned it as PR0. A member was quite precise &amp; he corrected that <img src='http://www.waveofweb.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Then I thought I should write a post about the difference between PR 0 &amp; n/a. It may look same but there is a subtle difference between them.</p>
<p><strong>What PR0 means</strong>: PR0 means that your site has been indexed. But due to the lack of quality of backlinks it is somewhere between PR0 to 1. If you have quite a few backlinks &amp; your PR is still 0, then your backlinks are not relevant &amp; quality enough.</p>
<p><strong>What PR n/a means</strong>: It can mean two things. Either your site is fairly new &amp; haven&#8217;t been online between two public PR updates (usually 3 months), or your site has been penalized by Google. So if you have a old site that had PR before but now showing a gray bar in pagerank, you should check your site address in Google search. If your site is still there in search, you can relax that you are not banned.</p>
<p>By the way, PR n/a can be shown in case of slow connection where the server fails to connect. So, don&#8217;t forget to check again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.waveofweb.com/seo/what-is-the-difference-between-pr0-pr-na/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
